Oracle/Windows question 2005-08-13 - By Niall Litchfield
Joe
your init.ora is probably just using good old db_block_buffers to size
the buffer cache rather than the newer XXX_CACHE_SIZE.
On 8/12/05, Leandro Guimaraes Faria C. Dutra <ldutra@(protected)> wrote:
>
> oracle-l-bounce@(protected) gravou em 2005-08-12 17:41:17:
>
> > Researching now, but does this make sense? Manual sez default=48:
>
> > SQL> show parameter db_cache_size
>
> > NAME TYPE VALUE
> > -- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- -- ---- ---
> > db_cache_size big integer 0
>
> Sounds like you should rethink all your Oracle memory
> configuration... or am I missing something here?
>
>
> --
> Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corcete DUTRA
> Administrador de Bases de Dados +55 (11) 4390 5383
> Toyota do Brasil Ltda ldutra@(protected)
> S?o Bernardo do Campo, SP BRASIL
>
> > SQL>
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged and intended solely for the use of the person/entity to whom it is
addressed. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by
returning via e-mail as well as delete this message from your system. Any
unauthorized use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is
prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. TOYOTA DO
BRASIL LTDA (including its group companies) shall not be liable for the
improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this
communication, neither for personal, nonbusiness related information nor
opinion sent through this email or even for any delay in its receipt or damage
to your system. TOYOTA DO BRASIL LTDA (or its group companies) does not
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been kept nor that this
communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference.
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
|
|
